shouldn't jake's time be the same in the max speed full and sub categories?

 Yes, it should be. Keep pointing out the mistakes, because I'm sure there are several typos left.

www.youtube.com/watch i had this video of iowa's 1'58"355 BBO WR around since i noticed it was missing from the list.

 It says excluding known 50hz times... Weren't most of JkL's times 50hz?

 Uchiha, thanks. I'll add the link to that.

Also, Mandalore do you have a source which confirms that JKL played in 50Hz? To as far as I know, most PAL times have not specified whether they were set in 60Hz or not.

 I just remember conversations at the time, him and Yazzo always played 50hz. He might've set a few token 60hz times when people complained, but I think the majority are 50hz. Yazzo might remember better.

Would be strange to just suddenly change to 60Hz, I would say. I suppose asking people that were active back then might know a few things regarding this.

it would be a good idea to look into the early pages of the WR topic since most of those times should be posted there when they were set.

if not, then asking Yazzo is the other option. i don't remember well who used 50hz and who used 60hz so it is better to ask before assuming wrongly.

I don't recall Joel ever saying he used 50hz, someone would have to ask him about it.

And I didn't always use 50hz, just in the end of my active period when my eyes started to get really hurt by the game and its speed which caused me to get a lot of headaches. 50hz fixed that temprorarily, but getting glasses/not play the game anymore fixed it permanently.

By looking at old topics where Yazzo has been in, he has said things like "why would he be playing in 60Hz?" and "there's no big fuzz about 50Hz". I don't know if I can believe in what Yazzo is saying right here, could you please be completely honest? (Here's the source to one of the topics: http://fzerocentral.org/viewtopic.php?t=1608)

For PAL players I think this is kind of common actually. I can see why a lot of people choose to play in 50Hz, since getting faster times is easier, then why not? The bad thing about this is that it's not fairplay to people who does not have the option to play in 50Hz. The majority has not this option available, and besides, the game was never meant to be played in 50Hz. It's your decision whether you choose to play fair or not, but can the people that choose 50Hz at least be honest? Considering that there's a huge complain about using 50Hz, I think people that did set their times in 50Hz got afraid to admit it and just went by saying their times were set in 60Hz.

So how do we confirm if the player has used 50Hz? Their times will remain labeled as 60Hz until strong indications of 50Hz has been provided. (Yazzo, dimi, and RichardTaro has very strong indications of using 50Hz.).

CGN: I was an ass at that time (7 years ago now). Those opinions are not with me anymore.

Anyway, I was at least honest that I used 50hz in contrast to what you guys are saying. If you wanna believe my reasons or not is up to you.

 Don't worry, I'm aware of that you've changed. With those old opinions of yours in mind, I just thought it was weird that a health issue was the real reason for not playing in 60Hz.

Well, there's a difference between thinking something is weird, and accousing someone of lying. All I can say is that my reasons for using 50hz are true, and back in the day I tried to justify using it by saying it wasn't a big deal, which was wrong and stupid of me.

 Just an idea here. For the WR times that don't have a video, how about posting the fastest known video in place until it is found (if ever)?

I just finished fixing the entire HTML of the WR list. There were a few single-quotes in places where there should not have been single-quotes to begin with. That is why it was difficult to update and detect the error. As most of us are aware of, single-quotes are invalid characters to submit on the site at the moment. That is why it became impossible to update the list for the last few months.

Everything should be up-to-date now, though.

I like the non-custom sub category.  I think non-quickstarg4 and non-sideattack also merit a subcategory.

imo, it is fine as it is. non-custom is a big difference vs custom. the other 2 have very little difference. nothing is stopping someone from suggesting no-fat shark, no-boost, no-MT or no-shift boost since these are on the same level of those imo (unless people are fine with those extra divisions_...)

If other people would like to, I could add a small table that consists of a few columns with the best non-light machine times? After all, light machines have been confirmed to be too unstable for the main category. But you know, after all these years of alllowing it on the site, it would be rather difficult to come up with a suitable solution for the rankings and such.

As for Side-Attacks we could perhaps add it if there's much demand for it? The thing is though, that Side-Attacks are not an issue at all. It's just a player's preference. However, since it has got quite some competition, adding a smaller list might not be that bad of an idea in the end?

Lastly I'd like to point out that my main problem with adding more categories is due to the insanely large list we've got going already. Additionally, you should keep in mind that it even excludes lap times...

Nevertheless, I'd like to know more opinions regarding this.

For the current Max Speed table, perhaps adding a row under each quickstarg4 time with a non-quickstarg4 time would suffice?

And yea, non-sideattack I suggested purely because there is a lot of competition for it.   I'm not sure what all the non-sideattack records are though.  (I'm guessing Brave has most of them)